Bipartisan Support for Immigration Reform in the House?

Last weekend, Representative Jeff Denham (R-CA) publically announced that he is joining the Democrats in support of a comprehensive immigration reform bill, specifically the one passed by the Senate earlier this year.  While we may like to think that Denham is doing this as a symbolic gesture of his willingness to break Congressional gridlock and make our country a more welcoming destination for immigrants, his true motive can be revealed by looking at electoral details.

Denham represents the 10th District of California, which has some telling demographic and electoral attributes.  Denham’s hold on the district is by no means secure, as the district’s partisan leanings have not been on his side recently.  Denham won in 2010 with only 52% of the vote, defeating his challenger by barely 11,000 votes.  The district voted for Obama in 2012, and Denham is facing a tough Democratic challenger in Michael Eggman in 2014.  Though Eggman does not have previous political experience, he is an agricultural-based district native with lots of local support.  Secondly, Denham’s district has a large Hispanic population (40% of the population), possibly due to the strong agricultural sector from which Eggman hails.  The combination of a tough political climate for a Republican and a large share of his constituency likely very interested in immigration reform makes it a smart electoral move for Denham to join Democrats in support of the Senate’s immigration reform bill.

Looking at the larger picture, however, Denham’s move alone does not affect the chances that the Senate’s reform bill will pass the House.  Currently, 185 Democrats have come out in support of the bill, and even if all Democrats were to vote for it, 17 or more Republicans would need to join them to pass the bill.  The Washington Post’s Sean Sullivan analyzed other studies and data to see how many other districts like Denham’s exist, with Republican Congressmen representing divided districts with large Hispanic populations.  Only 24 districts have a Hispanic population of greater than 25%, with 15 of those leaning strongly Republican.  This leaves only nine representatives (including Gary Miller and David Valadao from California and Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida), not enough to pass the bill through the House.  However, pro-reform interest groups have targeted 28 Republicans whom they believe they can sway to vote for the bill, so the list of potential aisle-crossers is not necessarily limited to nine.

In order to reach a floor vote, however, the Senate bill would have to make it through the House subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security, which is chaired by Trey Gowdy of South Carolina.  In July, Gowdy stated that “The Senate bill is not going to pass in the House,” which does not lend much optimism to the bill making it through committee unscathed.  Gowdy, like many other Republicans, believes in securing the border before providing a path to citizenship, something not accomplished in the Senate bill.  House Republicans seem more in favor of multiple, smaller immigration reform bills rather than the large sweeping Senate bill, something Marco Rubio supported last Monday.

Despite the many obstacles to immigration reform, Denham’s move, politically motivated as it might be, is encouraging if just for the fact that at least one member of Congress is willing to work with the other party to accomplish major reform.  Though the list of potential candidates is short, there is always the possibility that if enough Republicans support the Senate bill, or are at least willing to have a conversation about how to amend it so that both parties will support it, that Republican leadership both in general and in the appropriate committees will allow the bill to the floor for a vote.  The resulting conference committee could be either productive or a disaster, but any type of legislative action would certainly be better than the status quo.

-Chris Gibson

Advertisements

6 responses to “Bipartisan Support for Immigration Reform in the House?”

  1. legiprocess says :

    While committees are usually a gatekeeper, I think that any member can call for a vote on a bill brought from the Senate. I think we watched a video of the House Republicans suspending that rule for the budget negotiations.

    However, because immigration is a bill that most Republicans appose, we may see something similar to the budget process where the normal rules of the House as suspended and the Senate bill cannot easily be called up onto the floor by any Representative. I will be interesting to see what happens.

    Also, I was curious about what the issues the potential aisle crossers were interested in.

    -Jenny Wu

    • Chris Gibson says :

      Good point, I forgot about that when I was writing this up. Still, I think the chances on the House voting on the exact bill the Senate passed are unlikely, what with all the rhetoric from various prominent Representatives and leadership about drafting their own bill over the summer.

      As for the issues, I didn’t see anything specific, so maybe they’re endorsing the concept of immigration reform over any specific policy outcome for their own electoral gain. The main point of the Senate bill, though, is a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants.

  2. Maddie Josel says :

    While I do find it admirable that Denham is crossing the aisle to vote with the Democrats on this particular issue, I’m wondering if this will be enough to convince his constituents to keep him in office. I would have to make the argument that people look at outcomes more than they do how their Representative voted. If this bill doesn’t pass, regardless of whether or not Denham voted for it, I could see his district switching their vote to someone that would not only vote for what they wanted, but be a large advocator of immigration reform.

  3. Jane L. says :

    This is an excellent example of a member of Congress acting as a delegate even if that means going against his/her party. Maddie introduces a concern about whether simply supporting the bill will be enough to gain re-election, especially if constituents are focused on results and the bill does not become law. This seems to go back to the credit-claiming vs. position-taking lecture. While Republican representatives in left-leaning districts tend to rely more on credit-claiming than position-taking in press releases to constituents, this seems to be an example of the opposite. In this case, Denham is position-taking because he knows the majority of his constituents support the position, even though it goes against his party. This way, if the bill does not pass and the result does not enable him to credit-claim, his investment in position-taking will still help him in his re-elction efforts.

  4. Marissa Joy says :

    It would also be interesting to look at the Republican representatives in districts with 25% Hispanic populations and the potential of electoral competition. Since the threat of a challenger is one of the reasons that Denham is changing his position on immigration, it may not be a district’s strong Republican views that matter in districts with large Hispanic populations, but instead this threat of competition. If many of these Republican representatives from these districts feel such competition, they may be forced to shift their platforms to the left (just on the immigration issue) to capture the median voter’s stance on immigration. It seems like the goal to swap some of these Republicans could be even more tangible in districts with more electoral competition.

  5. legiprocess says :

    I think it will be interesting to see if this bill comes up for a vote at all. You’re talking about rallying enough Republican support for it to pass with high Democratic support, so wouldn’t it just be another bill that divides the Republican party and will be kept off the table?
    -Steph

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: